logo Satuki @ Home

Trade to win

Sign up for my latest trading ideas. Free!

Analyze FAZ: Confidence Booster

Posted by Satuki On April - 9 - 2009

A lot of people love FAZ because they can make a killing quickly when their bet is right on the target and they hate it because they are killed when their bet is off. It is all attributed to its volatility. Volatility is the nickname of all these triple leveraged ETFs. Analyzing or back testing stocks is the homework I do every night to better myself. I have already passed the stage of losing money due to my solid risk control. But I still need to work very hard to improve my emotional control.

 

How do I improve my emotional control? If I am very confident in my system, I would never hesitate to pull the trigger when there are signals for an entry.  So let us analyze FAZ. The chart below is the daily chart of FAZ.

 

 

 

Here is the trading plan that we use to run the back test. It is 100% TA driven.

  1.  I am a swing trader. So no day trading is involved in this test.
  2.  I run a 100k account for the sake of easy calculations
  3.  My risk/reward ratio is 1:3.5
  4.  Buy major support and short major resistance

 

For condition 3, my risk/reward ratio normally is 1:3 or 5% : 15% for regular stocks.  But for FAZ, let’s raise it slightly to 1:3.5 due to it is volatility. So percentage wise, it will be 15% : 53%. Why 15? It is because it is a triple leveraged fund. We need to multiple our regular 5% by 3.

 

Assuming I run a 100k account and I am conformable with a 20k swing position in a regular stock. For FAZ, I need to reduce the position size to 7K per trade because it is triple-leveraged. OK let us trade…..

 

When the first bottom labeled “1″(a major support) was formed, I took a trade and held onto it until it hit the target, assuming I had been desensitized. As we can see, the 15% stop loss gave me quite some room to wiggle.  It resulted in a successful hit, a 3500 profit. Let’s move on.

 

When the second bottom labeled “2″(another major support) was formed, I took another trade and held onto it until it hit the target, assuming I had been desensitized again. It gave me another successful hit, a 3500 profit, totaling 7000 after 2 trades.

 

When the third bottom labeled “3″(another major support) was formed, I took another trade and it was stopped. So I lost 1050. Since the major support was cracked after this trade, I would not touch until another major support is formed.

 

So I would have totaled 6000 in profits after 3 trades.  Of course I would make 60k if I increased my position size to 70K. And if I had the “courage” to bet 70% of my total stake on such a volatile stock and hold onto it overnight, I would NOT last long in this market.

 

So from this back testing, we can say that these would be very solid trades if I actually took them. And these trades would be successful only if I religiously followed my plan.  One key element besides “cut the losers and let the winners run” is never second guess your system. That is you need to take all the signals it feeds you.   Would you have a lot more confidence when you have a good understanding of your system?  Random shooting is absolutely a no-no. Let me know what you think.

 

I did not take any trades in the past 2 days since I was not prepared for the long side. Have a nice long weekend ,everybody!


Would you like to receive the latest trading ideas or other updates from my blog? Then join hundreds of others on my mailing list below. It is totally free and easy to opt-out.

Enter your email address:


Related Posts


  • Chucklehut

    Hi Trader Mom,

    Love the site!

    I guess one question I have always had when looking at FAZ and FAS, is why not buy or short FAS instead of FAZ, since it is cheaper and has the volume as well? It just simply makes more sense to me, since your money goes farther as you can acquire more shares?

    Thoughts?

    Thanks!

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com/blog/ Satuki (Trader Mom)

      I do not think the price of a stock really matters especially in the case of FAZ and FAS because their moves are totally symmetric in percentage. That is if FAZ goes up 20% then FAS goes down 20% also. Having more shares does not mean you can make more money. it is all about percentage.

      For example, you have 20K. Whether you buy FAS or FAZ does not matter since 20% of 20k is 4000. One reason that people tend to buy cheap stocks is because having more shares makes them feel good psychologically . There is nothing wrong trading penny stocks. Trading penny stocks can be very profitable. I am just not good at it.

  • Chucklehut

    Hi Trader Mom,

    Love the site!

    I guess one question I have always had when looking at FAZ and FAS, is why not buy or short FAS instead of FAZ, since it is cheaper and has the volume as well? It just simply makes more sense to me, since your money goes farther as you can acquire more shares?

    Thoughts?

    Thanks!

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com Trader Mom

      I do not think the price of a stock really matters especially in the case of FAZ and FAS because their moves are totally symmetric in percentage. That is if FAZ goes up 20% then FAS goes down 20% also. Having more shares does not mean you can make more money. it is all about percentage.

      For example, you have 20K. Whether you buy FAS or FAZ does not matter since 20% of 20k is 4000. One reason that people tend to buy cheap stocks is because having more shares makes them feel good psychologically . There is nothing wrong trading penny stocks. Trading penny stocks can be very profitable. I am just not good at it.

  • Wai

    Hi Trade Mom,

    Is it a fate or what?! I just lost thousands in FAZ today and saw your web site. I desperately need to learn the techniques (especially ‘stop loss’) and control my emotion. I want to learn from you!! I’m reading some books (Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques, Swing Trading Power Strategies, etc.) HELP!!

    Thanks!!

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com/blog/ Satuki (Trader Mom)

      Wai, EasyE has a few good points. 1 Never remove your stop loss on any positions you have. 2 Pay attention to the underlying index.

      As for controlling your emotions, it will take sometime to master it. I suggest you reduce the size of your positions to a level where you are not worried about without looking at them. Do not rush. Do not revenge trade.

  • Wai

    Hi Trade Mom,

    Is it a fate or what?! I just lost thousands in FAZ today and saw your web site. I desperately need to learn the techniques (especially ‘stop loss’) and control my emotion. I want to learn from you!! I’m reading some books (Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques, Swing Trading Power Strategies, etc.) HELP!!

    Thanks!!

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com Trader Mom

      Wai, EasyE has a few good points. 1 Never remove your stop loss on any positions you have. 2 Pay attention to the underlying index.

      As for controlling your emotions, it will take sometime to master it. I suggest you reduce the size of your positions to a level where you are not worried about without looking at them. Do not rush. Do not revenge trade.

  • EasyE

    My only thought that is decay should enter into the analysis with an ETF like this. With that being said, I am not a big fan of doing any sort of TA on the ETF itself but rather the index it follows. Every time I have, I seem to tend to lose site of the inherent decay that exist with ETFs that seek daily returns.

    With that being said, I just do my TA on the Russell Financial 1000 and obviously base my buy/sell discussions on the inverse of whatever the index happens to be doing. Paying attention to the price swings on these things drive me nuts…. So I just remove it from the analysis. The only time I look at the price is the minutes before and after I place my order, at which point I just look at the price for a means of setting my stops and limits.

    Also, to the commenter above, if you toy with these things without any stops in place, you are asking for it, as I know from experience. The only good thing about it however is that you can just as quickly get the money back you lost just a quickly. Just use stops and minimize the risk.

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com/blog/ Satuki (Trader Mom)

      I am Ok to watch them swing since my position(Swing) size on these leveraged ETFs are small relative to my account size Risk is limited when I day trade them. So I tend to have bigger positions when day trading.

  • EasyE

    My only thought that is decay should enter into the analysis with an ETF like this. With that being said, I am not a big fan of doing any sort of TA on the ETF itself but rather the index it follows. Every time I have, I seem to tend to lose site of the inherent decay that exist with ETFs that seek daily returns.

    With that being said, I just do my TA on the Russell Financial 1000 and obviously base my buy/sell discussions on the inverse of whatever the index happens to be doing. Paying attention to the price swings on these things drive me nuts…. So I just remove it from the analysis. The only time I look at the price is the minutes before and after I place my order, at which point I just look at the price for a means of setting my stops and limits.

    Also, to the commenter above, if you toy with these things without any stops in place, you are asking for it, as I know from experience. The only good thing about it however is that you can just as quickly get the money back you lost just a quickly. Just use stops and minimize the risk.

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com Trader Mom

      I am Ok to watch them swing since my position(Swing) size on these leveraged ETFs are small relative to my account size Risk is limited when I day trade them. So I tend to have bigger positions when day trading.

  • Lama Trout Trader

    I agree with Easy E. I think that using TA on FAZ chart is a big mistake. You need to chart RIFIN. You also need to pay attention to percentage than dollar amount, because of the nature of these ETF’s to track daily percentage moves. And they also can drift based on demand, which is why you should also glance at FAZ.IV & FAS.IV to see if they are trading at a premium.

    FAZ & FAS don’t care how much they are down or up from a few days ago, the nature of these ETF’s are such that they only care about actualizing the daily gain/loss. However, I will say that many folks, myself included, got into these ETF’s without necessarily understanding how they work. They use derivatives as well as holding stocks in the index. Consequently, it does occur to me that many people may be charting the ETF itself, thereby making a self-fulfilling prophecy, but I don’t even want to try to play that game.

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com/blog/ Satuki (Trader Mom)

      I disagree that TA is useless on FAZ. As we can see from the chart above, it was pure TA driven. And the set-ups were pretty good. Problem is that people second guess their systems. If you took all the set-ups in the charts, you would have made decent money(outlaid 21k for a 6k return, which is a whooping total of 35%). People might hesitate on set-up 1 and 2. And they might take set-up 3 because they regret that they did not take 1 and 2. Their trade failed and then they started to second guess their systems again. This will cause a vicious circle.

      There is nothing really special about these 3X ETFs as long as you factor in the volatility and reduce your position size for swing trading. It would be even better if you could just day trade them

  • Lama Trout Trader

    I agree with Easy E. I think that using TA on FAZ chart is a big mistake. You need to chart RIFIN. You also need to pay attention to percentage than dollar amount, because of the nature of these ETF’s to track daily percentage moves. And they also can drift based on demand, which is why you should also glance at FAZ.IV & FAS.IV to see if they are trading at a premium.

    FAZ & FAS don’t care how much they are down or up from a few days ago, the nature of these ETF’s are such that they only care about actualizing the daily gain/loss. However, I will say that many folks, myself included, got into these ETF’s without necessarily understanding how they work. They use derivatives as well as holding stocks in the index. Consequently, it does occur to me that many people may be charting the ETF itself, thereby making a self-fulfilling prophecy, but I don’t even want to try to play that game.

    • http://www.momdaytrader.com Trader Mom

      I disagree that TA is useless on FAZ. As we can see from the chart above, it was pure TA driven. And the set-ups were pretty good. Problem is that people second guess their systems. If you took all the set-ups in the charts, you would have made decent money(outlaid 21k for a 6k return, which is a whooping total of 35%). People might hesitate on set-up 1 and 2. And they might take set-up 3 because they regret that they did not take 1 and 2. Their trade failed and then they started to second guess their systems again. This will cause a vicious circle.

      There is nothing really special about these 3X ETFs as long as you factor in the volatility and reduce your position size for swing trading. It would be even better if you could just day trade them


Twitter: Follow Trader Mom
RSS Feed: Subscribe in a reader





Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin